United States v. Arizona
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
641 F.3d 339 (2011)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
The Arizona Legislature passed S.B. 1070, a state law designed to deter the unlawful entry and presence of illegal aliens in the state. Before the law went into effect, the federal government (plaintiff) filed suit against the State of Arizona (defendant) in district court and sought a preliminary injunction to prohibit the implementation of four specific provisions of the statute. The federal government argued that the federal immigration law scheme preempted Arizona’s new immigration law and that the law violated the Federal Commerce Clause. The district court granted the government's request for an injunction. Arizona appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Paez, J.)
Concurrence (Noonan, J.)
Concurrence
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.