Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Aulicino

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
44 F.3d 1102 (2d Cir. 1995)


Facts

Robert Aulicino, Jr., David Cleary, and Louis Ruggiero, Jr. (defendants) were members of a kidnapping ring that was divided into two crews. One crew, led by Steven Palmer, identified the potential victims, while the second, led by Ruggiero and Cleary, abducted the targets and demanded ransoms. The ring assembled a list of 10 targets and, over the next three-and-a-half months, attempted seven kidnappings. Otmar Delaney was abducted and escaped, but the ring continued to attempt to extort Delaney even after his escape. The ring also acquired a large ransom from Alvin Goings that was used to purchase vehicles for future kidnappings. Robert Mercedes was tortured and shot several times, while David Crumpler was shot and killed after Crumpler’s family refused to pay ransom. In early 1991, after Palmer’s death, the ring ceased the kidnapping activities. Eventually, most of the remaining members were arrested and charged with violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1962. RICO prohibits participation in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity. Racketeering activity includes felonious acts or threats involving murder, kidnapping, or extortion, and a pattern of racketeering activity requires at least two acts within a period of 10 years. Cleary and Ruggiero were convicted under RICO and appealed, arguing that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to establish a RICO pattern, because their activities had only occurred over a period of three-and-a-half months, and (2) the government had failed to prove any threat of continuity, because the enterprise had ended naturally.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kearse, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.