United States v. Bach

400 F.3d 622 (2005)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Bach

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
400 F.3d 622 (2005)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Dale Bach (plaintiff) was a registered sex offender with a prior conviction in Minnesota for criminal sexual conduct with a 14-year-old boy. Following a report from a concerned mother about contact between Bach and her minor son, the St. Paul Police Department discovered that Bach was in contact with multiple minors and was engaged in the digital transmission of child pornography. Bach was charged under federal law for employing a minor in interstate commerce to produce visual content of the minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Bach was convicted and sentenced to 15 years in prison, the federal mandatory minimum sentence. The district court held that the mandatory minimum sentence applied because Bach had a prior state conviction for an offense related to the sexual exploitation of children. Bach appealed, arguing that the 15-year mandatory minimum did not apply to him because his prior conviction was for child sexual abuse, not child sexual exploitation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 829,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership