United States v. Baldwin
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
54 M.J. 308 (2001)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Captain Holly Baldwin (defendant) was tried by court-martial for offenses including larceny, mail tampering, and obstruction of justice. The panel hearing for Baldwin’s case consisted entirely of officers. Before Baldwin’s court-martial, she and other officers, including those on her panel, attended a mandatory command meeting. During this meeting, the attendees were told that court-martial sentences were too lenient, that officers should always be punished more harshly than enlisted soldiers, and that the minimum court-martial sentence should be one year. On the last day of Baldwin’s court-martial, Baldwin and the officers on her panel were required to attend another mandatory command meeting, causing a delay in Baldwin’s trial. The meeting again focused on overly lenient court-martial sentences. After the meeting, Baldwin’s court-martial reconvened, and she was convicted and sentenced to dismissal, a one-year confinement, and total forfeiture of pay and allowances. The convening authority approved the sentence, and the Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. Nine months later, Baldwin submitted a statement to the Court of Criminal Appeals. The statement included details of the statements made at the two command meetings and alleged that the meetings had constituted unlawful command influence over Baldwin’s court-martial. The United States government (plaintiff) asserted that Baldwin’s claim lacked merit. The Court of Criminal Appeals summarily affirmed Baldwin’s sentence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.