From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
United States v. Barclays Bank
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Through the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the United States government (plaintiff) placed economic sanctions on Cuba, Iran, Libya, Sudan, and Burma (the sanctioned countries). Regulations imposed by the OFAC with regard to the sanctions forbade banks from transacting with the sanctioned countries. From the 1990s to 2006, Barclays Bank (Barclays) (defendant), a bank organized under the laws of England and Wales with a branch in New York, processed payments made by the sanctioned countries and hid the payments from its New York branch by amending payment messages to remove the names of the sanctioned countries. Though the instructions to hide the payments came from outside the United States, Barclays’s actions caused the New York branch to process payments made by the sanctioned countries. This resulted in the New York branch violating economic sanctions, prevented the New York branch from complying with filing requirements imposed by the OFAC and the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, and caused the New York branch to record false information. In 2006, after an internal investigation revealed the transactions to Barclays’s senior management, Barclays voluntarily disclosed its transactions with the sanctioned countries to the United States government. The government charged Barclays with violating economic sanctions by knowingly causing the New York branch to transact with the sanctioned countries. The government and Barclays entered into a deferred-prosecution agreement, which required Barclays to improve its sanctions-compliance programs by hiring additional compliance officers, enhancing its internal review processes, conducting more frequent audits, and providing sanction-specific compliance training to many of its employees.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.