United States v. Barr

617 F.3d 370 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Barr

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
617 F.3d 370 (2010)

Facts

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (code) § 7403, the United States sought to collect on the tax debt of Charles Barr (defendant) by foreclosing on and selling the Michigan home that Charles owned with his wife, Carolyn Barr (defendant), as tenants in the entirety. Carolyn opposed the foreclosure, arguing that she owned more than a 50 percent interest in the house because she was likely to outlive Charles and that she owed no taxes. Carolyn further argued that she was entitled to more than 50 percent of any sale proceeds due to her purported majority ownership stake. The United States responded that foreclosing on the house was proper under Michigan law. The district court ruled that the United States could foreclose on the house and that the sale proceeds should be divided equally between the Barrs. In doing so, the district court applied the balancing test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Rodgers. Carolyn appealed, reiterating her life-expectancy theory and arguing that (1) her right as a tenant in the entirety to prevent Charles from selling the house entitled her to a majority of any sale proceeds and (2) the district court improperly applied Rodgers.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership