United States v. Basye
United States Supreme Court
410 U.S. 441 (1973)
- Written by Robert Taylor, JD
Facts
Permanente Medical Group (Permanente) was a limited partnership operated by Basye and his partners (partners) (plaintiffs). Permanente entered into a contract with Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (Kaiser), a medical-services membership organization, whereby Permanente agreed to provide medical services to Kaiser’s members. In exchange for the services, Kaiser paid base compensation to Permanente comprised of (1) monthly payments and (2) contributions to a retirement trust. The retirement trust maintained separate tentative accounts for each of its beneficiaries, all of whom were Permanente partner and non-partner physicians. Participating physicians who completed a required minimum period of continuous service and met other requirements could begin receiving trust payments upon retirement. The tentative accounts of physicians failing to meet certain requirements would be forfeited and redistributed among the retirement trust’s other beneficiaries. Under no circumstances could the trust-fund payments be altered or recouped by Kaiser. Neither Permanente nor its partners reported the trust income on their federal tax returns. The federal tax commissioner assessed deficiencies against each of the partners for their proportionate shares of the funds that Kaiser had paid into the trust. The partners paid the assessments and then filed suit against the United States government (government) (defendant) in federal district court, seeking a refund. The district court entered judgment in favor of the partners, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.