Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Bear Marine Services

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
696 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1983)


Facts

International Matex Tank Terminals, Inc. (IMTT) (defendant) maintained a structure called a dolphin in the Mississippi River. A tug pulling a barge struck the dolphin, causing an oil spill. The United States (the government) (plaintiff) sued IMTT and Bear Marine Services (defendant) for the damage under a tort theory of maritime negligence. IMTT sought dismissal, arguing that the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1376 was the exclusive option available to the government to seek damages for oil-spill cleanup and that the government could not sue under a tort theory of maritime negligence. The district court concluded that the FWPCA did not prevent the government from suing third parties contributing to an oil spill on a theory of maritime negligence. The district court refused to dismiss the negligence claim, but nevertheless certified for immediate appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) the question of whether the FWPCA was the only means for oil-spill recovery from third parties (which IMTT was, because even if it contributed to the spill, it did not discharge any oil). The motions panel preliminarily permitted the appeal. Subsequently, in United States v. M/V Big Sam, 681 F.2d 432 (5th Cir. 1982), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the government may sue third parties who contributed to oil spills under tort theories as well as the FWPCA. Both parties argued that, despite the resolution in the Big Sam case of the key issue for which the appeal was sought, the Fifth Circuit could speed resolution of the case as a whole by deciding other, ancillary questions raised by the parties.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.