United States v. Belgorodskaya

2014 WL 1796424 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Belgorodskaya

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2014 WL 1796424 (2014)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, Inc. (Conference) was a not-for-profit organization that screened applicants and administered funds the German government made available for Jewish Holocaust victims. Over a period of 16 years, fraudulent applications containing altered identification documents and false stories of persecution were submitted, including by many Conference employees. The fraudulent scheme cost the German government $57 million. For four years, Raisa Belgorodskaya (defendant) collected and gave passports and birth certificates to a Conference employee who altered the documents to make the applicants eligible for reparations. Belgorodskaya received $300 for each fraudulent application. Belgorodskaya also submitted her own fraudulent application falsely stating that she had lived in a Ukrainian ghetto, arranged for her children to receive two payments, and made two calls to the Conference employee responsible for the investigation threatening the employee and his daughter. Belgorodskaya pleaded guilty to mail fraud, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, and witness tampering. Belgorodskaya’s counsel informed the court of Belgorodskaya’s current age and medical condition and submitted records from two of her doctors. Belgorodskaya’s counsel did not address the presentence report’s statement that Belgorodskaya had obtained a college degree in bookkeeping when in fact she had completed four years at the university after seven years of grade school. At sentencing, the court stated that it had taken Belgorodskaya’s health into account, but Belgorodskaya’s long-term involvement in the fraudulent scheme and the threats she made required a meaningful penalty involving prison. The court imposed a six-month prison sentence. Belgorodskaya petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence, claiming that her counsel failed to adequately investigate and present her mental and physical health and to correct the presentence report’s description of her education.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Griesa, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership