United States v. Bello

194 F.3d 18 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Bello

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
194 F.3d 18 (1999)

Facts

Jesús Bello (defendant) was an inmate at MDC-Guaynabo (MDC), a federal prison in Puerto Rico. After a perceived slight by Bello during food service, fellow inmate Domingo Santana-Rosa (Santana) told Bello that Santana and another prisoner were going to crack open Bello’s head. Santana then went to sit with other inmates. One of those inmates later told Bello that Santana planned to attack Bello in the recreation yard. Bello chose not to report Santana’s threat for fear of being labeled a snitch. Two days later, Bello entered the recreation yard and saw Santana playing dominos. Bello preemptively struck Santana on the head with the top of a broom. Bello was indicted for assaulting a prisoner in violation of federal law. One element of the offense was that the act must have occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The government asked the district court to take judicial notice that the jurisdictional element was satisfied because MDC was located within a United States military base. The government provided official maps in support. At trial, the court took judicial notice that the events occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States and instructed the jury that it was not required to accept the judicial notice as conclusive. The district court also denied Bello’s requests for jury instructions on self-defense and duress, finding that no facts in the case warranted such defense instructions. The jury found Bello liable for assault. Bello appealed, contesting the judicial notice and denial of defense instructions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lipez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership