United States v. Berger
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
473 F.3d 1080 (2007)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Berger (defendant) was the president, chief executive officer, and chairman of a consumer electronics company (the company). Berger’s company entered into a revolving credit agreement with a group of banks. Under the credit agreement, the company could borrow money based on its accounts receivable and inventory. The company was required to provide the banks with a daily report of its financial status. The company falsified these daily reports in order to borrow more than its credit limit. The company also provided the false information to its accountants and auditors, which led to false filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Berger was charged with, among other offenses, violations of the securities laws based on the omission of material facts about the company’s fraudulent accounting practices, default of the credit agreement, and overdrawn status on its line of credit. Berger was convicted after trial, and on appeal, argued that the district court used the wrong materiality standard for securities-fraud violations.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.