United States v. Biggs
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
441 F.3d 1069 (2006)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Donzell Biggs (defendant) was in prison serving a life sentence for murder. Biggs was in the administrative-segregation unit, where inmates were confined to two-person cells for 23 hours of the day. For one hour per day, the inmates were in a recreation cell with three other inmates. During this recreation hour, Biggs attacked fellow inmate Michael Smith with a homemade knife. Biggs claimed that Smith threatened Biggs on the way to the recreation cell and that Biggs knew Smith had been trying to acquire a knife from other inmates. Based on these facts, Biggs alleged that his use of force against Smith was self-defense. Biggs pled guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of contraband in prison. However, Biggs reserved the right to appeal on the ground that the district court erred in finding that Biggs had not made a prima facie case for self-defense. The district court determined that Biggs had failed to demonstrate a lack of reasonable alternatives to the use of force against Smith and rejected Biggs’s claim of self-defense. Biggs appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Beezer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
