United States v. Billie

667 F. Supp. 1485 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Billie

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
667 F. Supp. 1485 (1987)

DC

Facts

James Billie (defendant) was a member and chairman of the Seminole Indian Tribe who practiced medicine but had not yet earned the title of medicine man. Florida panthers, an endangered species, are important to Seminole tradition, and parts of the animal are included in a medicine man’s bundle to heal various ailments. In 1983, Billie killed a Florida panther on the Seminole Indian Reservation and was charged with taking and possessing an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). At trial, Billie testified to having no specific plans for the animal at the time of the killing but later decided the panther parts would be an honorable gift to a medicine man. Billie moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that the ESA does not abrogate or modify traditional Indian hunting rights on the Seminole Indian Reservation and that the ESA violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Paine, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership