United States v. Bin Laden

92 F. Supp. 2d 189 (2000)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Bin Laden

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
92 F. Supp. 2d 189 (2000)

Facts

Congress passed numerous statutes meant to combat acts of terrorism, both domestic and abroad. Some of these include 18 U.S.C. § 844, dealing with damage to United States property through use of explosives, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 2332a, dealing with conspiracy to kill U.S. citizens using weapons of mass destruction, and 18 U.S.C. § 930(c), which relates to attacks on federal buildings. Fifteen foreign nationals, including Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, Mohamed Rashed Daoud al-‘Owhali, and Khalfan Khamis Mohamed (defendants), were charged with various terrorism-related offenses based on those statutes. In addition, the defendants were charged with crimes related to the August 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Africa. Odeh moved for dismissal of various counts of the indictment, arguing that the statutes were not meant to operate outside of the United States, or that if they were, Congress exceeded its authority in drafting the statutes to operate extraterritorially.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sand, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 787,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership