United States v. Bin Laden
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
92 F. Supp. 2d 189 (2000)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Congress passed numerous statutes meant to combat acts of terrorism, both domestic and abroad. Some of these include 18 U.S.C. § 844, dealing with damage to United States property through use of explosives, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 2332a, dealing with conspiracy to kill U.S. citizens using weapons of mass destruction, and 18 U.S.C. § 930(c), which relates to attacks on federal buildings. Fifteen foreign nationals, including Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, Mohamed Rashed Daoud al-‘Owhali, and Khalfan Khamis Mohamed (defendants), were charged with various terrorism-related offenses based on those statutes. In addition, the defendants were charged with crimes related to the August 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Africa. Odeh moved for dismissal of various counts of the indictment, arguing that the statutes were not meant to operate outside of the United States, or that if they were, Congress exceeded its authority in drafting the statutes to operate extraterritorially.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sand, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.