United States v. Bin Laden
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
58 F. Supp. 2d 113 (1999)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
The United States government charged 15 people, including Mohamed Sadeek Odeh (defendants) with crimes arising from a series of August 1998 terrorist bombings on four United States embassies in Africa and attempts to thwart the investigation. In November 1998, at the government’s first meeting with defense counsel, the government advised counsel that the case would likely involve the disclosure of classified information during the litigation and trial. Knowing that a background investigation could take a while, the government suggested that defense counsel promptly initiate steps to obtain security clearance. Thereafter, the government requested entry of a protective order to govern the sharing and disclosure of information in the case. The proposed protective order would prohibit any defendant or his counsel from accessing classified information without security clearance and would require all defense counsel and relevant court personnel to obtain security clearance through the process established by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ maintained eligibility requirements for obtaining security clearance, such as United States citizenship, national loyalty, and trustworthiness. The security-clearance process would be supervised by a court officer, not a member of the prosecution team. Odeh, joined by others, objected to the proposed protective order to the extent that counsel was required to obtain security clearance. Odeh’s counsel also moved to intervene in the matter for the limited purpose of asserting his personal objection on the grounds of his constitutional right to privacy.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sand, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.