United States v. Bin Laden

58 F. Supp. 2d 113 (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Bin Laden

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
58 F. Supp. 2d 113 (1999)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

The United States government charged 15 people, including Mohamed Sadeek Odeh (defendants) with crimes arising from a series of August 1998 terrorist bombings on four United States embassies in Africa and attempts to thwart the investigation. In November 1998, at the government’s first meeting with defense counsel, the government advised counsel that the case would likely involve the disclosure of classified information during the litigation and trial. Knowing that a background investigation could take a while, the government suggested that defense counsel promptly initiate steps to obtain security clearance. Thereafter, the government requested entry of a protective order to govern the sharing and disclosure of information in the case. The proposed protective order would prohibit any defendant or his counsel from accessing classified information without security clearance and would require all defense counsel and relevant court personnel to obtain security clearance through the process established by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ maintained eligibility requirements for obtaining security clearance, such as United States citizenship, national loyalty, and trustworthiness. The security-clearance process would be supervised by a court officer, not a member of the prosecution team. Odeh, joined by others, objected to the proposed protective order to the extent that counsel was required to obtain security clearance. Odeh’s counsel also moved to intervene in the matter for the limited purpose of asserting his personal objection on the grounds of his constitutional right to privacy.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sand, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership