United States v. Board of Harbor Commissioners
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
73 F.R.D. 460 (1977)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The SICO Company and North American Smelting Company (defendants) were charged with discharging oil into navigable waters in violation of a federal statute. The complaint of the United States (plaintiff) read in pertinent part as follows: “The defendants, and each of them, own and operate onshore facilities...from which oil was discharged into the Delaware River...or the defendants, and each of them, took actions which caused such oil to be discharged.” The defendants moved for a more definite statement of a pleading under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the government’s complaint was vague in that it did not allege the amount of oil discharged or what “actions” caused the discharge.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Latchum, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.