United States v. Bonds
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
730 F.3d 890 (2013)
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Barry Bonds (defendant), a celebrated baseball player who was the son of another famous player, for obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. The charge arose from testimony that Bonds gave before a federal grand jury investigating his and other professional athletes' rumored use of steroids and other banned performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). The prosecutor asked Bonds to tell the grand jury if his trainer, Greg Anderson, had ever given Bonds a self-injectable substance. Bonds' rambling reply, to the effect that he might chat with Anderson about fishing, but never about baseball or each other’s personal business, included what became known as "Statement C": "That's what keeps our friendship. You know, I am sorry, but that—you know, that—I was a celebrity child, not just in baseball by my own instincts. I became a celebrity child with a famous father. I just don't get into other people's business because of my father's situation, you see." Statement C was factually truthful about Bonds' celebrity lineage, and the grand jury later learned the truth about Anderson's distribution of self-injectable PEDs from Bonds himself as well as from other witnesses. Nevertheless, the jury found that Statement C was misleading and evasive, and that Bonds was guilty of obstructing justice. The court sentenced Bonds to 30 days' home confinement and two years' probation. Bonds's subsequent appeal was heard by a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Schroeder, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.