United States v. Booz
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
451 F.2d 719 (1971)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) accused Edward Booz (defendant) of robbing a bank with an accomplice in April 1967. One of the robbers lost a hat during the robbery. Three days after the robbery, Mr. Kulp saw a man leave a white truck and search the bank's vicinity, presumably looking for the hat. Kulp told the investigator, Agent Bass, that the truck's license plate number was S0633. Bass made a note of that number. Booz's trial began in January 1971. Both Kulp and Bass reviewed Bass's 1967 notes to refresh their present recollection of the truck's license plate number. Despite this review, it was unclear from Kulp's testimony if his memory of the plate number had been refreshed. Bass testified that, having reviewed his notes, he remembered Kulp told him the plate number was S0633. Other evidence at trial established that this number was similar to the plate numbers of Booz's two trucks. The jury found Booz guilty, and he appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, arguing Bass's testimony regarding Kulp’s statement to him was inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Seitz, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.