United States v. Borowski
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
977 F.2d 27 (1992)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Borowski (defendant) was the president and owner of Borjohn (defendant), a mirror manufacturer that used nickel plating solutions and nitric-acid stripping baths. Borjohn disposed of the nickel and nitric-acid baths by dumping them into sinks without pretreating them. The sinks drained into underground pipes that fed into the municipal sewer system and then into publicly owned treatment works. Borjohn was required to comply with the pretreatment regulations established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which prohibited nickel and nitric-acid discharges into publicly owned treatment works in amounts exceeding certain levels. Borjohn’s nickel and nitric-acid discharges exceeded the EPA’s pretreatment standards. Exposure to high amounts of nitric acid and nickel can cause serious health problems. Borjohn’s employees were required to bail out the nickel and nitric-acid baths by hand, scrape the sides and bottom of nickel baths, and pour the solutions into sinks, often resulting in solutions splashing and spilling onto their skin. Borjohn and Borowski knew that Borjohn’s employees were repeatedly exposed to nitric acid and nickel and the health dangers of such exposures. Borjohn and Borowski were indicted under the knowing-endangerment provision of the Clean Water Act (CWA) for knowingly discharging nickel and nitric acid into the sewer system and publicly owned treatment plant, thereby placing Borjohn’s employees in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. Borjohn and Borowski were convicted and moved for judgments of acquittal on the ground that the CWA’s knowing-endangerment provision does not apply to danger that occurs at the source of the discharge before pollutants reach public sewers or publicly owned treatment works.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hornby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.