United States v. Borowski

977 F.2d 27 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Borowski

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
977 F.2d 27 (1992)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Borowski (defendant) was the president and owner of Borjohn (defendant), a mirror manufacturer that used nickel plating solutions and nitric-acid stripping baths. Borjohn disposed of the nickel and nitric-acid baths by dumping them into sinks without pretreating them. The sinks drained into underground pipes that fed into the municipal sewer system and then into publicly owned treatment works. Borjohn was required to comply with the pretreatment regulations established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which prohibited nickel and nitric-acid discharges into publicly owned treatment works in amounts exceeding certain levels. Borjohn’s nickel and nitric-acid discharges exceeded the EPA’s pretreatment standards. Exposure to high amounts of nitric acid and nickel can cause serious health problems. Borjohn’s employees were required to bail out the nickel and nitric-acid baths by hand, scrape the sides and bottom of nickel baths, and pour the solutions into sinks, often resulting in solutions splashing and spilling onto their skin. Borjohn and Borowski knew that Borjohn’s employees were repeatedly exposed to nitric acid and nickel and the health dangers of such exposures. Borjohn and Borowski were indicted under the knowing-endangerment provision of the Clean Water Act (CWA) for knowingly discharging nickel and nitric acid into the sewer system and publicly owned treatment plant, thereby placing Borjohn’s employees in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. Borjohn and Borowski were convicted and moved for judgments of acquittal on the ground that the CWA’s knowing-endangerment provision does not apply to danger that occurs at the source of the discharge before pollutants reach public sewers or publicly owned treatment works.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hornby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership