United States v. Botsvynyuk
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
552 F. App’x 178 (2014)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
The Botsvynyuk Organization was a criminal enterprise that included Omelyan Botsvynyuk (defendant), Stepan Botsvynyuk (defendant), and three of their brothers. The Botsvynyuks operated a cleaning business with workers smuggled into the United States from Ukraine. The workers were promised good pay, and then they were forced to work for little or no pay. Attempts to escape were met with violence, threats of violence, and threats to the workers’ family members in Ukraine. The five Botsvynyuks were indicted for conspiracy to conduct a racketeering enterprise under the four-part forced-labor portion of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in federal district court. Aggravated sexual assault in furtherance of racketeering activities and Omelyan’s leadership role were included in the jury instructions as sentencing factors. The Botsvynyuks were found guilty of RICO conspiracy. Omelyan was also found guilty of extortion under the Hobbs Act. Omelyan filed motions for a judgment of acquittal and a new trial, both of which were denied. Omelyan appealed, alleging erroneous jury instructions. Stepan also appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vanaskie, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.