United States v. Bowen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
172 F.3d 682 (1999)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) brought an action against Bowen, the manufacturer of instruments that are used to sterilize dental handpieces—SteriSafe Handpiece Sterilizer and SteriDot High Purity Water Ampule. The FDA alleged that the instruments were adulterated and that the SteriDot was misbranded in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and sought to enjoin Bowen from engaging these instruments in interstate commerce. The district court ruled for the FDA, and Bowen appealed and argued that neither instrument was a device under 21 U.S.C. § 321(h) of the FDCA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Graber, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.