United States v. Bowling
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
770 F.3d 1168 (2014)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
James Bowling (defendant) faced one felony and several misdemeanor charges. The court informed him that the felony carried a sentence over one year. Before trial, the prosecutor offered to dismiss the felony if Bowling pled guilty to the misdemeanors. The court rescheduled the trial date, but Bowling did not officially enter his plea until three months later. Meanwhile, Bowling attempted to buy a gun. When he filled out the required federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives form, he denied being under indictment for crimes carrying a sentence over one year. As a result, the federal government (plaintiff) charged Bowling with making a false statement in connection with buying a gun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6). The state prosecutor testified that the felony charge remained pending at the time. Bowling’s attorney tried to question the state prosecutor about the plea deal he offered Bowling and the rescheduled trial date, but the court did not allow him to submit that testimony to the jury. Instead, Bowling’s counsel made an offer of proof showing what the prosecutor would have said. The jury convicted. Bowling appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Manion, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.