United States v. Bowser
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
532 F.2d 1318 (1976)
Curtis Bowser (defendant), Sharon Held (defendant), and Robert P. Farrelly (defendant) conspired to take money from a bank in San Francisco, California. Bowser waited outside in a getaway car while Farrelly went inside the bank and handed a note to Held, who worked as a bank teller, demanding money with the threat of violence if she did not comply. Held handed over about $5,000 to Farrelly who carried the money outside the bank and into the getaway car. Held waited a short period of time so that Farrelly could get away before informing her supervisor that she had been robbed. The three defendants were charged with entering a bank with intent to commit a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a); bank larceny in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(b); and conspiracy to commit bank larceny in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Prior to trial Farrelly and Held entered pleas of guilty to the third count and the other counts were dismissed. Bowser stood trial and was found guilty by a jury on all three counts. Bowser appealed, arguing that he was improperly charged with larceny.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Christensen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.