United States v. Brennan

629 F. Supp. 283 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Brennan

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
629 F. Supp. 283 (1986)

SC

Facts

Judge William Brennan (defendant) was charged with soliciting and accepting bribes in relation to his cases. A career criminal, Salvatore Polisi, was arrested and faced charges in Brennan’s court. Polisi decided to become an informant for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). At the FBI’s direction, Polisi began discussions with Anthony Bruno, an associate, and Brennan about trading information regarding Polisi’s case for money. At Brennan’s trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) introduced a map of the inside of a restaurant in which Brennan had dined with Bruno and discussed the bribe. The map depicted the table at which Brennan and Bruno sat, along with nearby tables at which undercover FBI agents sat. The map had a key that depicted the distance between the tables. In addition, during final argument, the prosecution used a chart containing pertinent dates and events in its case listed chronologically. The events depicted in the chart were based on authenticated phone records and recordings. The jury found Brennan guilty. Brennan filed a motion to set aside the verdict.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Weinstein, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership