United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
603 F.2d 1022 (1979)
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted John T. Brown (defendant) for theft. Government evidence suggested Brown's friend Jerome Proulx accompanied Brown to the crime scene and may have assisted Brown in the theft. At trial, Proulx reluctantly testified for the government. After extended hesitant and incoherent testimony in which Proulx appeared forgetful and confused, the judge declared Proulx a hostile witness under Federal Rule of Evidence 611(c). The judge then allowed the prosecutor to ask Proulx leading questions in order to speed Proulx's testimony and make it easier for the jury to understand. The jury convicted Brown. On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Brown argued the judge erred in treating Proulx as a hostile witness.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bownes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.