United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
485 F.3d 274 (2007)
Joseph Buchanan (defendant) worked as a park ranger in the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Each ranger had an individual computer. Buchanan routinely viewed pornographic material on his work computer. When confronted by his supervisor on multiple occasions, Buchanan admitted to this conduct and promised to cease viewing the pornographic material. While monitoring Buchanan’s computer, Buchanan’s supervisor found images of child pornography in Buchanan’s temporary internet folder. The supervisor downloaded the contents of the folder to a CD and contacted law enforcement. Buchanan claimed that the website he was visiting at the time contained both adult and child pornography. The FBI determined that the CD contained a total of 127 images. Fifty-four of the images depicted minors. The majority of the images were thumbnails, which would be displayed as preview images on a webpage. However, there were four larger image files depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Analysis of Buchanan’s computer also revealed several encrypted files containing thousands of pornographic images. Buchanan was convicted of four counts of receiving child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and § 2252(b)(1), one for each of the four larger files found in the temporary internet folder. Buchanan was also convicted of possession of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(A) for other images found on Buchanan’s hard drive. Buchanan appealed on the ground, among others, that the four counts of receiving child pornography violated the rule against multiplicity.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Owen, J.)
Concurrence (Benavides, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.