United States v. Budovsky

2015 WL 5602853 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Budovsky

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2015 WL 5602853 (2015)

Facts

Arthur Budovsky (defendant) was the main founder of Liberty Reserve S.A. (Liberty) (defendant), a Costa Rican company. Budovsky moved to Costa Rica and founded Liberty after having been convicted in New York state court of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The United States indicted Budovsky and Liberty for creating and operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business designed to facilitate illegal financial transactions and launder criminal proceeds. The United States alleged that Liberty operated a virtual currency called LR, which processed approximately 55 million separate financial transactions and helped launder more than $6 billion in illegally obtained money. According to the indictment, Liberty helped users hide their identities by, for example, not requiring identity verification, allowing users to hide their account numbers when making transactions, and requiring users to exchange traditional currency for LR and vice versa through third parties rather than by making direct deposits or withdrawals. The United States further alleged that Liberty (1) had more than 200,000 users in the United States, including criminal rings; (2) moved approximately $13.5 million through a bank account located in the Southern District of New York; and (3) engaged in money laundering with the intent of transferring assets in and out of the United States. Budovsky moved to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that applying United States criminal statutes to his purportedly purely extraterritorial conduct violated due process. Per Budovsky, the indictment did not allege a sufficient nexus between his alleged crimes and the United States, and Liberty’s large user base in the United States could not be enough to satisfy due process because that would mean that any business anywhere in the world would be subject to United States criminal law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cote, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership