United States v. Burt
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
410 F.3d 1100 (2005)
Border Patrol Agents Brian Brown and Mike Van Edwards arrested Marnie Burt (defendant) for transporting illegal aliens. Burt informed the agents that she was aware of plans to transport a large number of illegal aliens the following weekend. The agents agreed not to seek prosecution, and Burt agreed to return the following day to provide more information about the upcoming plan. The next day, May 23, Agent George Scott interviewed Burt. According to Burt, Scott informed Burt that if she was working to gather information for the agents, she would not be doing anything illegal. According to Scott, he informed Burt not to do anything illegal and to contact the agents with any information she gathered. On May 28, Burt was arrested again while transporting illegal aliens. Burt claimed that she was working for Van Edwards. After learning of Burt’s arrest, Scott destroyed his notes from the May 23 interview. Burt was charged with transporting illegal aliens and conspiracy to transport illegal aliens. Burt requested a jury instruction on the defense of public authority. The trial court refused the jury instruction, and Burt was convicted on both charges. Burt moved for a new trial, but the motion was denied. Burt appealed on the ground that the trial court erred in failing to give the jury instruction on the public authority defense.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bright, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.