United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
587 F.2d 678 (1979)
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Richard Cain (defendant) for interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle. Cain and a companion stole a truck to aid them in escaping from a federal prison in Texarkana, Texas. Shortly after the escape, an unidentified caller informed a Louisiana state trooper he had seen two shirtless men walking away from an abandoned truck and attempting to hitch a ride. A few minutes later, another unidentified caller described two shirtless men five miles farther down the road. Law enforcement located the two men and stopped them for questioning. The men were taken to the parish jail, where authorities identified the men as the prison escapees and the abandoned truck as stolen. At trial, the only evidence linking Cain to the stolen truck was the state trooper’s testimony about the first unidentified caller's report. The judge admitted this testimony under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. The jury convicted Cain. He appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, arguing the judge erred in admitting the testimony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.