United States v. Campbell
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
743 F.3d 802 (2014)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Christopher Campbell and two other men (defendants) were on a boat that had no obvious ties to a particular country. While the boat was in international waters, the United States Coast Guard pursued the boat, and the men dumped several bales of marijuana into the ocean during the pursuit. After being caught by the Coast Guard, Campbell claimed that the boat was registered in Haiti. However, the Haitian government would neither confirm nor deny the registration claim. The men were arrested and charged in United States federal court with violating the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA) by (1) possessing a controlled substance with the intent to distribute it and (2) conspiring to distribute a controlled substance. The MDLEA allowed the United States to prosecute anyone who manufactured, possessed, or distributed a controlled substance in a vessel that (1) was stateless, (2) was in United States waters, or (3) was registered to or in the waters of a country that agreed to allow the enforcement of United States law. A vessel was stateless if the claimed country of origin would not confirm the vessel’s registration. The MDLEA did not require any nexus or connection between the alleged criminal conduct and the United States. Campbell was convicted of both charges. On appeal, Campbell argued that (1) Congress lacked authority to pass a law that criminalized conduct with no connection to the United States and (2) the MDLEA violated his right to due process because he had no notice that he could be held criminally liable for conduct with no connection to the United States.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pryor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.