From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
United States v. Campos
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
306 F. 3d 577 (2002)
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Erick Arias Campos (defendant) for illegal possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. The federal district court trial evidence showed that police officers found methamphetamine in Campos's room, along with a gun, ammunition, and false identification. A typical amount of methamphetamine for personal consumption was 3.5 grams, worth about $70. The officers found 50.6 grams in Campos's room. This was enough to qualify as a distribution amount worth between $1,000 and $1,500. A drug dealer could afford that amount, but not a poorly paid day-worker like Campos, unless he had an illegal source of income. Downstairs, the officers found a pen casing that contained methamphetamine residue. The officers testified that Campos exhibited no signs of drug addiction and had no drug paraphernalia on his person. Campos testified that he was a methamphetamine addict who used the pen casing to ingest the drug, and that he only had a large supply of methamphetamine on hand because he bought it at the bargain price of only $200. A witness for Campos testified that he saw Campos line up small amounts of methamphetamine for ingestion, though the witness admitted that he never actually saw Campos ingest the drugs. The jury convicted Campos, and he moved for a new trial. The judge found the defense testimony as to Campos's drug addiction credible, especially in light of the methamphetamine-tainted pen. The judge ruled that the government's circumstantial evidence against Campos was not strong enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Campos intended to distribute methamphetamine, and that this suggested that the jury's verdict indicated a possible miscarriage of justice that entitled Campos to a new trial. The government appealed the judge's ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hansen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.