United States v. Carona
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
660 F.3d 360 (2011)
While employed as a county sheriff, Carona (defendant) accepted bribes from Haidl. Haidl confessed to criminal activity during the course of a federal investigation and agreed to act as a government informant. Prosecutors for the United States government (plaintiff) directed Haidl to secretly record meetings with Carona. The federal prosecutors knew that Carona was represented by an attorney. After initial meetings failed to produce useful evidence, the prosecutors supplied Haidl with fabricated subpoena documents intended to provoke Carona into making incriminating statements. When Haidl confronted Carona with the fictitious subpoenas, Carona made self-incriminating statements. At trial, Carona argued that the use of false legal documents amounted to direct contact between the prosecution and a represented suspect in violation of California Rule 2-100. Carona moved to suppress the resulting statements. The district court refused to suppress the evidence obtained through Haidl’s use of the false subpoenas, even though it also concluded that the government prosecutors had violated California ethics rules. Carona appealed the district court’s decision to deny suppressing the related evidence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clifton, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.