United States v. Castle
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
925 F.2d 831 (1991)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Two Canadian officials, Donald Castle and Darrell Lowry (defendants), were indicted under the general conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371, for conspiring to bribe foreign officials in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Castle and Lowry were charged with accepting a $50,000 bribe from two employees of Eagle Bus Company to guarantee acceptance of Eagle Bus Company’s bid to provide buses to the Saskatchewan provincial government. Castle and Lowry could not be prosecuted for violating the FCPA itself, as it did not criminalize receipt of bribes by foreign officials. Castle and Lowry filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against them, arguing that as Canadian officials they could not be prosecuted for conspiracy to violate the FCPA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.