United States v. Chaplin

25 F.3d 1373 (1994)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Chaplin

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
25 F.3d 1373 (1994)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted James M. Chaplin (defendant) on four counts, three of which were for perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621. Count Two charged that Chaplin falsely denied paying Joseph Voss $8,000 on October 23, 1990. Bank records showed that amount was deposited that day in Voss's account, but Voss testified only that Chaplin paid him $8,000 sometime that month. Count Three charged that Chaplin falsely denied storing material in Voss's garage. Voss gave vague testimony that Chaplin did store material there. Al Payment testified that in 1991 he saw material labelled as Chaplin's in the garage, and a photograph that Payment took in 1991 showed the material in Voss's garage. Count Four charged that Chaplin falsely denied later removing the material. Voss testified that the material stayed in his garage until early 1992. Donald Rhode testified that he saw Chaplin driving away from Voss's house with material in his pickup truck. The jury convicted Chaplin on Counts Two, Three, and Four, and he appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ripple, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership