United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
112 F.3d 1550 (1997)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc. (Cherry Hill) (defendant) imported textile-dyeing machines from Taiwan. At entry, Cherry Hill declared the machines to be duty-free. However, 13 months after entry, the United States Customs Service (customs) (plaintiff) liquidated the entries and assessed duties of approximately $12,000. Customs gave notice of the liquidation to Cherry Hill, and Cherry Hill did not file a protest within the 90-day period established by law. Customs then filed an enforcement action before the United States Court of International Trade seeking payment of the assessed duties, arguing that under 19 U.S.C. § 1514, Cherry Hill’s failure to protest made the liquidation final and conclusive. Cherry Hill argued in response that the “final and conclusive” language of § 1514 applied only to actions brought by importers to recover excess duty deposits, not to enforcement actions. The court agreed with customs and granted summary judgment, and Cherry Hill appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bryce, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.