United States v. City of Los Angeles

288 F.3d 391 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. City of Los Angeles

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
288 F.3d 391 (2002)

Facts

The United States (plaintiff) alleged that the police department of the City of Los Angeles (city) (defendant) had a pattern and practice of depriving individuals of civil rights through excessive force, false arrests, and improper searches and seizures. The two parties negotiated a settlement requiring the city to take certain reform actions. The United States then filed a lawsuit against the city in federal district court. The parties jointly asked the court to enter their settlement agreement as a consent decree. Two groups moved to intervene in the lawsuit: (1) the Los Angeles Police Protective League (Police League), the collective-bargaining representative for 8,600 police officers; and (2) community organizations and individuals residing in Los Angeles (the community residents). The Police League sought to intervene because the proposed consent decree would interfere with the terms of its members’ current bargaining agreement with the city. The community residents sought to intervene because the police department’s practices, reformed or otherwise, impacted their daily lives. The district court denied both requests, and both groups appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership