United States v. City of Los Angeles
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
288 F.3d 391 (2002)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The United States (plaintiff) alleged that the police department of the City of Los Angeles (city) (defendant) had a pattern and practice of depriving individuals of civil rights through excessive force, false arrests, and improper searches and seizures. The two parties negotiated a settlement requiring the city to take certain reform actions. The United States then filed a lawsuit against the city in federal district court. The parties jointly asked the court to enter their settlement agreement as a consent decree. Two groups moved to intervene in the lawsuit: (1) the Los Angeles Police Protective League (Police League), the collective-bargaining representative for 8,600 police officers; and (2) community organizations and individuals residing in Los Angeles (the community residents). The Police League sought to intervene because the proposed consent decree would interfere with the terms of its members’ current bargaining agreement with the city. The community residents sought to intervene because the police department’s practices, reformed or otherwise, impacted their daily lives. The district court denied both requests, and both groups appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.