United States v. Clemons

32 F.3d 1504 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Clemons

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
32 F.3d 1504 (1994)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

Eugene Clemons and Dedrick Smith (defendants) were convicted of murdering a federal agent engaged in the performance of his official duties. Clemons shot and killed Special Agent George Douglas Althouse of the Drug Enforcement Administration during a carjacking that Clemons committed to steal an engine for Smith. Clemons and Smith later fled town after realizing that the car was likely a police car. Clemons and Smith were tried together in federal district court. At trial, Smith testified in his own defense. The district court did not allow the government (plaintiff) to cross-examine Smith about Smith’s prior conduct. However, the district court allowed Clemons’s attorney wide latitude in cross-examining Smith as a codefendant. Clemons’s attorney attempted to impeach Smith by asking Smith whether Smith had ever used or sold crack cocaine. Clemons and Smith both appealed from their convictions, and Smith argued in relevant part that the district court had erred by permitting Clemons to ask Smith impeaching questions that were irrelevant to Smith’s truthfulness under Federal Rule of Evidence 608.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kravitch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership