United States v. Coker

433 F.3d 39 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Coker

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
433 F.3d 39 (2005)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

Edward Coker (defendant) set three small fires inside an apartment building and left a fake Molotov cocktail at the scene. Shortly after, police found Coker nearby in a car and retrieved many objects matching witnesses’ descriptions from Coker’s car. Two witnesses promptly identified Coker. Local police charged Coker with burning or aiding in the burning of a dwelling house and a property-destruction crime. Coker retained an attorney. The county fire department notified the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) of the Molotov cocktail. An ATF agent interviewed several witnesses while local police were present. A few days later, ATF agents asked Coker to consent to an interview although the ATF knew Coker had a lawyer in the state case. Coker waived his Miranda rights and confessed to setting fire to the apartment building. Coker was federally indicted on an attempted-arson charge, and he moved to suppress the confession because it violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The district court denied Coker’s motion to suppress, and Coker was convicted of attempted arson. Coker appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)

Concurrence (Howard, J.)

Concurrence (Cyr, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership