United States v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
366 U.S. 380 (1961)
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Edison) (plaintiff) owned many real-estate properties from 1946 to 1951. Each year, the State of New York would perform a valuation of the properties and assess property taxes accordingly. Edison disagreed with the valuation of its properties and filed a protest with the state, which was its only option to contest the valuation. Under state law, Edison’s protest did not stay the tax payment. To prevent its properties from foreclosure, Edison paid the full amount of the tax, despite believing that the state’s valuation was 15 percent too high. As a result of the protest process, the state determined that the valuation was 5 percent too high, and issued a refund to Edison. Edison used the accrual method of accounting, which allowed it to recognize all expenditures and gains at the time the right to receipt or obligation to pay existed. Edison deducted the full tax payment on its tax returns for 1951. The federal tax rate was higher in 1951 than in the prior five years. Edison believed that it had not accrued 15 percent of its property taxes while the protest was still pending. However, the Internal Revenue Service denied Edison a tax refund for 1951. To recover the overpaid taxes, Edison brought suit against the United States government (government) (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The district court ruled in favor of the government, and Edison appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Whittaker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.