United States v. Crockett
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
435 F.3d 1305 (2006)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Blayde Crockett (defendant) was charged with conspiracy and filing false tax returns in connection with a tax-evasion scheme. As part of this scheme, the Reed family asked Crockett to prepare their tax return for 1995. At trial, Crockett testified in his own defense. Crockett testified that he would never advise or help anyone to evade tax obligations. On cross-examination, the prosecution (plaintiff) asked, over Crockett’s objection, about the fact that Crockett did not file personal income-tax returns for the years 1992 to 1998. Crockett was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that the cross-examination was not relevant and improperly outside the scope of his direct testimony.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKay, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.