United States v. Cruz
United States Court of Military Appeals
25 M.J. 326 (1987)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Approximately 40 soldiers in a battalion at Pinder Barracks, Federal Republic of Germany failed drug tests. In response, Colonel Leslie E. Beavers, the installation commander, decided to publicly shame the suspected drug users. Beavers called a mass formation of approximately 1,200 soldiers. The 40 suspects, including Sergeant Juan C. Cruz (defendant), were called out of the formation, and led to a platform where Beavers was speaking. The suspects were stripped of their unit crests and then saluted Beavers, who did not return their salutes. The suspects were marched as a group to an adjacent site where, in full view of the soldiers still in formation, they were searched and handcuffed by Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) agents. After being taken to CID headquarters for questioning, the suspects were returned to barracks but were billeted separately from their unit. After preferral of charges, the suspects were given the option to return to their unit, but 27 of them, including Cruz, declined. These 27 soldiers, nicknamed the Peyote Platoon, continued to live and assemble separately from the battalion. Cruz pleaded guilty to possession and distribution of marijuana and was sentenced to confinement for 16 months as well as additional punishment. Four months after his court-martial, Cruz alleged that the public shaming had violated Article 13 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and had induced him to accept the pretrial agreement for 16 months’ confinement. The Court of Military Review affirmed Cruz’s sentence, and Cruz appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.