Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Curtin

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
489 F.3d 935 (2007)


Kevin Eric Curtin (defendant) was arrested for making plans to have sex with an undercover police officer posing as a 14-year-old girl. Curtin had been communicating with the officer online, and they planned to meet in person to have sex. At the time Curtin was arrested, he was at the location where he had planned to meet the undercover officer, and he possessed an electronic device containing 144 stories involving adult men having sex with young girls. Most stories also involved incest and one included bestiality. One of the stories contained similar language to what Curtin had sent to the undercover officer. Curtin’s defense at trial was that he had known that the undercover officer was an adult woman pretending to be a girl, and his only intention was to act out a daddy-daughter fantasy with another adult. The government offered into evidence the 144 stories Curtin had with him at the time he was arrested to show modus operandi, intent, preparation, and knowledge. The trial court stopped the questioning involving the stories shortly into the testimony introducing them, and then held that the only admissible portions of the stories were those that went directly to Curtin’s modus operandi, intent, preparation, and knowledge, and eventually limited the number of stories admitted to only five out of the original 144. The court did not read each story itself before admitting these stories into evidence. Following his conviction, Curtin appealed the admission of the stories.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Trott, J.)

Concurrence (Kleinfeld, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 509,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 509,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial