United States v. Davis
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
596 F.3d 852 (2010)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Terry Davis (defendant) was charged with theft and fraud for stealing money from his fraternity. Davis was the treasurer of the fraternity when the alleged theft occurred. At trial, the district court permitted the prosecution to introduce the testimony of the fraternity’s new treasurer, Jimmy Hammock. Hammock testified that Davis, referring to the money missing from the fraternity, had asked him, “Can we just split this $29,000.00 and make this situation just go away?” Hammock testified that he had responded by saying that if Davis wanted to negotiate a settlement, Davis needed to talk to the fraternity’s counsel or president. The prosecution admitted that it was not introducing Hammock’s testimony to prove that Davis was attempting to obstruct the criminal investigation. Davis was convicted. Davis appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.