United States v. Davis

779 F.3d 1305 (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Davis

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
779 F.3d 1305 (2015)

Facts

Jerry Thomas Davis (defendant) was convicted of possession of an unregistered short-barreled shotgun. Just before his arrest, two police officers responded to a 911 call that Davis had pointed a sawed-off shotgun at another person. One of them, Jady Pipes, was the only person who saw Davis throw an object out of a car window. After Davis was caught by the police, the police discovered that the object was a sawed-off shotgun. During Davis’s trial, Davis sought to exclude evidence that Pipes was the police chaplain as well as a police officer. The trial court required that during his testimony, Pipes could not wear his uniform hat, which contained a large cross visible to the jury. The trial court permitted the prosecution to refer to Pipes as chaplain and to testify that his title was chaplain. Following his conviction, Davis appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in permitting evidence of Pipes’s title as chaplain in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 610.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hinkle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership