United States v. Davis
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
905 F.2d 245 (1990)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Peter Davis (defendant), a non-United States citizen, was the captain of the Myth, a sailing vessel registered by the United Kingdom believed to have been smuggling drugs. The Myth departed from Hong Kong and was suspiciously headed towards San Francisco when it was stopped by a United States Coast Guard boat several miles offshore. Davis refused to let the Coast Guard officers on board, stating that they lacked the authority to board the ship. Rather than continuing on the journey towards San Francisco, Davis announced that the Myth would sail to the Caribbean by way of Mexico. The Coast Guard then requested, and was granted, permission by the United Kingdom to board the Myth pursuant to an agreement with the United States. The Coast Guard officers then boarded the Myth and found packages of marijuana. Davis was charged with possession of marijuana and conspiracy to possess marijuana on a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States (plaintiff) with intent to distribute in violation of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA). Davis moved to dismiss the charges for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that the MDLEA did not apply to persons on foreign vessels outside the territory of the United States. The motion was denied, and Davis was later found guilty. Davis appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiggins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.