United States v. De La Torre
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
599 F.3d 1198 (2010)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Julio De La Torre (defendant) on two counts of possessing a controlled substance with intent to distribute, one count for methamphetamines and the other for marijuana. The trial evidence established that police raided a hotel room where De La Torre and others had been smoking marijuana. A police officer saw De La Torre running from the hotel with a backpack, which the officer later saw De La Torre discard. When police retrieved and searched the backpack, they found distribution quantities of marijuana and methamphetamines inside. De La Torre testified that another occupant of the room gave him the backpack, and that because the room's occupants had been using marijuana exclusively, De La Torre believed the backpack contained marijuana but no other drugs. De La Torre admitted that, after police retrieved and searched the backpack, he realized that the backpack also contained methamphetamines. The judge instructed the jury that the government did not need to prove that De La Torre knew the precise nature of the illegal drugs in his possession, and that the jury could convict De La Torre on the methamphetamines count even if they believed that De La Torre was ignorant of the methamphetamines in the backpack. The jury convicted De La Torre for possessing both marijuana and methamphetamines, and De La Torre appealed the methamphetamines conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.