United States v. Delfino
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
510 F.3d 468 (2007)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
James and Jeaniene Delfino (defendants) did not file tax returns for 1993 through 2004. Additionally, the Delfinos assigned their incomes to trusts that failed to file returns or pay taxes. The Delfinos refused to cooperate with an audit conducted by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Accordingly, the IRS assessed taxes against the Delfinos based on bank records. In doing so, the IRS did not include deductions to which the Delfinos would have been entitled. The Delfinos were convicted of numerous criminal charges. At sentencing, the Delfinos contended that the United States’ tax loss due to their crimes should be reduced to reflect deductions that they could have claimed. The district court disagreed and, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline (USSG) § 2T1.1(c)(1), sentenced the Delfinos based on the tax loss that the IRS assessed. The Delfinos appealed, claiming that deductions had to be included in the tax-loss calculation pursuant to (1) the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Schmidt and (2) USSG § 2T1.1(c)(2)(A).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shedd, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.