United States v. Demjanjuk

838 F. Supp. 2d 616 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Demjanjuk

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
838 F. Supp. 2d 616 (2011)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

John Demjanjuk (defendant) was born Iwan Demjanjuk in Ukraine, drafted into the Soviet army during World War II, and captured and recruited by the Nazis. After Germany surrendered, Demjanjuk was held in a displaced-persons camp. Demjanjuk applied for a US visa under the Displaced Persons Act (DPA) and was naturalized in 1958. In 1977, the United States (the government) sought to denaturalize Demjanjuk for concealing on his visa application that he had served as a Schutzstaffel (SS) guard. The court revoked Demjanjuk’s citizenship based on a photographic card identifying Demjanjuk as a guard at Trawniki concentration camp and testimony that the photograph was of Ivan the Terrible, the Treblinka camp’s gas-chamber operator. Demjanjuk was deported, extradited to Israel, convicted of war crimes, and acquitted after eyewitnesses identified another as Ivan the Terrible. Demjanjuk’s extradition judgments were vacated, and his citizenship was restored because the government had suppressed exculpatory evidence. In a second denaturalization proceeding, the government submitted documentary evidence of Demjanjuk’s service as an SS guard at Trawniki and three other camps. Experts testified that the documents were authentic. The court found that Demjanjuk had lied on his visa and naturalization applications; helped persecute a civilian population, making him ineligible for a DPA visa; and illegally procured citizenship. Demjanjuk was deported and tried by Germany. The press reported that a 1985 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) report cast doubt on the Trawniki identification card’s authenticity. An FBI agent had stated that the Soviet Union punished anti-Soviet dissidents by providing the US with falsified records of dissidents’ participation in war crimes and opined that Demjanjuk’s prosecution could have been initiated and controlled by the Soviet Committee for State Security, known as the KGB. The agent did not independently investigate, interview witnesses, or review documents. The German proceeding was stayed. Demjanjuk moved for relief from his denaturalization judgment, arguing that the government’s withholding of the FBI documents constituted a fraud on the court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Polster, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership