Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Dentsply International, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
399 F.3d 181 (2005)


Facts

Dentsply International, Inc. (Dentsply) (defendant), was the leading manufacturer of artificial teeth. Dentsply sold artificial teeth to dental dealers, who would then sell the teeth to dental laboratories for use in dentures. Dentsply enjoyed a share of 75 to 80 percent in the market for artificial teeth. This market only consisted of 12 or 13 manufacturers. In 1993, Dentsply began a policy of terminating relationships with dealers who stocked artificial teeth sold by Dentsply’s competitors. Although many dealers would have preferred to stock artificial teeth from several manufacturers, no dealer could afford to lose Dentsply as a supplier. Subsequently, all of the major dealers began to exclusively purchase artificial teeth from Dentsply. The United States (plaintiff) brought an action against Dentsply, seeking an injunction. The government contended that Dentsply had engaged in unlawful conduct aimed at maintaining a monopoly in a violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act. The district court held that Dentsply’s excusive-dealing policy did not foreclose competition in the relevant market. The government appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Weis, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.