Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U

United States v. DiCristina

726 F.3d 92 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. DiCristina

United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
726 F.3d 92 (2013)

Facts

Lawrence DiCristina (defendant) operated a poker club in in New York. DiCristina was charged with violating the federal Illegal Gambling Business Act (IGBA) and was found guilty by a jury. DiCristina moved for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that poker was not prohibited under the IGBA because poker was not a game of chance. The IGBA included a list of business operations that constitute gambling, all of which involved games of chance. DiCristina argued that the only way to give effect to this list was to interpret gambling under the IGBA as limited to games of chance. DiCristina conceded that poker constituted gambling under New York law. The district court judge determined that the IGBA was ambiguous but held that the IGBA was limited to games of chance and entered a judgment of acquittal for DiCristina. The prosecution (plaintiff) appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Straub, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Jurisprudence

Key Terms